My colleague said that there is confusion out there and I should put this out on my blog as others may be asking the same questions. I was more than happy to oblige, with one condition – that they read some of my cloud posts. So we have a deal, and here we go.
My first recommendation to my colleague was to perform an assessment of what they have today. This assessment should include the facilities, but also, networks, servers, storage, tools, applications, access options, capacity, and disaster recovery. Once we have that completed assessment, a picture of what we have in place today, let’s identify today’s pain points. This quickly revealed that it truly is a facility issue that is putting constraints on the operations, and the ability to deliver capability to the business.
To remodel a production data center online is almost impossible. I have done it once in my career, but it comes with high risk, and many challenges. In addition, to make that investment of building a new data center and make the TCO financially sustainable, you have a great deal of homework ahead of you.
So to make sure we are all on the same page, my definition of a co-location is taking your operations and renting space from Joe’s Data Center and putting it on their floor. You pay to rent the floor space that includes power, cooling, and network / internet connectivity. It is your servers, storage, equipment. You still maintain your process(s), procedure, operations, monitoring and break/fix. A hosted solution is just moving your application(s) and data to their data center on their servers/storage and you maintain the application, they maintain the infrastructure. Cloud based services is renting an application or called Software as a Service (SaaS) or renting some storage for DR or called Infrastructure as a Service.
There are benefits to each scenario and you have to look at the cost(s), risk(s) and operations. In addition, your disaster recovery plan. Going to an option that takes your mission critical infrastructure and applications off premise comes with risk. You have to take into account carrier performance, geographic risks, power grids, and so forth. If your corporate office or key production facility just lost internet connection, they no longer have access to applications or infrastructure – what impact does that have on the business? Do you have redundant circuits between different carriers? Are the different carriers all renting space on the same fiber that was just cut? Do you have redundant power grid supply lines – from different substations? You now have all these factors to consider as your data center is miles away from all your users and many things out of your control. Here is a diagram I found in some of my archives:
The other question was, should I just push everything to the cloud now and be done with it? So given the information they shared, I don’t think you can push your entire data center to the cloud. Things like email, and even your voice services can go to the cloud. But your mission critical systems – can you really get them into a Cloud offering and deliver at or above your current operation? Probably not. What about your corporate data, is the organization comfortable with that data sitting in a multi tenancy environment out of your control? Probably not. So look for the quick wins and easy decisions to make to get some of that out of your data center today. This will help take the load off your aging environmental components while you determine your course of action.
Some of the feedback I get is to just say “if it was you, what would you do….”. I have tried to not do that, but I know folks are interested in my opinion. Given what I know from my colleague, I would build a new data center on premise, that is much smaller than what you have today, and that brings much needed automation, and process improvement. I would place your MDF in that new data center, your key infrastructure components, and mission critical applications. I would turn your email, video conference, voice services, and SharePoint into SaaS solutions. I would also drive virtualization – nothing moves from old data center to new data center without a new plan. New virtualization plans for server, storage, and desktop. I would develop a hybrid cloud solution and look for some appliance solutions for the integration to your external cloud solution. I would look for a storage IaaS solution for your archive data – encrypted of course. I would also build your MPLS WAN for all site connections and put your security in the cloud as a service. Let the security experts do that for you.
This accomplishes a few things, 1) you remove the risk of a facility failure, 2) you take the load off your limited staff and let them focus on mission critical components, 3) you start the cloud journey small and grow into it as it makes sense, 4) you are now in a position to deliver a more successful DR plan to the organization, 5) you will drive down cost(s) with your new facility with the new technology and new approach.
I am not opposed to co-location solutions, I just have found the TCO for that solution hard to sell. You add up all your cost(s), risk(s), risk avoidance, and operational changes, and you can no longer afford it.
Keep it positive!
Scott Arnett
scott.arnett@charter.net
No comments:
Post a Comment